| 枫林在线论坛>>学术热点 [普通模式] [上一主题] [下一主题] |
| [362497] 主题： How to read a research paper - a clinician's view |
| 作者： flyhi |
标题：  How to read a research paper - a clinician's view |
|
| 昵称： p53 |
来自： 192.168.*.* 
|
|
| 经验值： 3804 | 发贴时间： 2005年08月27日 20:18:09 | |
| 等级： 对答如流 | 长度： 1308字 | |
|
A research paper contain the following sections: Title, Abstract, Introducti on, Material and Methods, Results, Discussion and the Literatures cited. When reading a paper, I use the order Conclusion in Abstract, Introduction, Results, Conclusion and MM. An abstract summarize the study with brevity and readability. It contains a few items such as Purpose of the study, the Model involved, the Specific dat a show in Results and Conclusion. The Conclusion may directly show me the im portance of the study. Why an introduction should by emphasized? A good introduction should give th e reader a circumstance to understand the significance of the study whether you are a specialist or not. Results show the analyzed data to prove the conclusion. Usualy author descri be the results in the form of a figure or table that are most relevant. Discussion is the most interesting part of the research paper. The gloden ru le of discussion is to interpret your data in appropriate depth. With the in terpretation of the results the author desribe the importance of these findi ngs and recommend future directions. The mechanisms is the focus to explain the observations. With the hypothesis author discuss with other evidence to verify the conclusion and try to offer an appropriate explanation. -- ※作者已于 2005-08-31 21:45:28 修改本文※ |
||
|
========== * * * * * ==========
|
| 作者： flyhi |
标题： Re: How to read a research paper - a clinic's view
|
|
| 昵称： p53 |
来自： 192.168.*.*
|
|
| 经验值： 3819 | 发贴时间： 2005年08月27日 20:32:32 | |
| 等级： 对答如流 | 长度： 709字 | |
|
Common errors in chinese research papers.
The most obvious error in chinese research papers is the fluent of english a bstract. Many papers paid no attentions to the spelling, clarity of the sent ences. Then the data in the results didn't been analyzed. The raw data without desc ription make the editor confused. Many author used the t test and chi-square to analyze data even it is not suitable. Show me the evidence not the signi ficance only. Then the discussion, it is difficult to interpret in appropriate depth. Do n ot describe the result twice or conclude some explanations didn't justified in the results. The author should focus on his own study not present a revie w of the literatures. |
||
|
========== * * * * * ==========
|
| 作者： sunfield |
标题： Re: How to read a research paper - a clinic's view
|
|
| 昵称： KID~十万卷书听海潮 |
来自： 192.168.*.*
|
|
| 经验值： 6661 | 发贴时间： 2005年08月27日 20:42:00 | |
| 等级： 精于此道 | 长度： 232字 | |
|
呵呵，这是一个好的开端，很多专业论坛都是从怎样读PAPER开始讨论的
贴个连接http://www.shmu.edu.cn/courses/2005spr/upload/0321/how%20to%20read%2 0a%20paper.pdf 这是研究生前沿文献精读课的材料 我尤其喜欢第3篇 HOW TO EVALUTE A PAPER |
||
|
========== * * * * * ==========
|
| 作者： sunfield |
标题：  Re: How to read a research paper - a clinic's view
|
|
| 昵称： KID~十万卷书听海潮 |
来自： 192.168.*.*
|
|
| 经验值： 6664 | 发贴时间： 2005年08月27日 20:58:40 | |
| 等级： 精于此道 | 长度： 850字 | |
|
这是老里八早写在BLOG上的：
我发现，我仍然不会读文献 当我只能刻刻巴巴地翻译出全文时，我不知道读文献应该先从图开始；当我听鲁白先生 推荐读文献的方法是abstract—figure－result－discussion时，我还不知道要力图领 会作者的全部思路；当我能明白作者提出什么hypothesis，用什么方法证明，用什么做 对照，前前后后的story是什么时，我的批判性眼光却不知道去了那里；当我终于能找出 JBC或者PNAS上的一辆个漏洞，笑嘻嘻的说他对照不完全的时候，我读过的文献还少的可 怜；当师兄告诉我要学会泛读，要学会把一个相关课题PNAS和JBC以下的文章快速地览其 要旨，然后挑出做的极好的CNS级的文章细细精读，我仿佛豁然开悟，却仍然会在一篇已 经“精读”过N次的文章上被问倒；当我仔仔细细的看过背景资料和几乎所有的referen ce，老板却问，你认为作者接下去会做什么？…… -- ——"It's going to be all right,dont worry..." ——"I'm not worried, Harry. I'm with you." |
||
|
========== * * * * * ==========
|
| 作者： lightfire |
标题： Re: How to read a research paper - a clinician's view
|
|
| 昵称： GGYY*浩歌归去 |
来自： 192.168.*.*
|
|
| 经验值： 2353 | 发贴时间： 2006年02月27日 23:40:58 | |
| 等级： 对答如流 | 长度： 14字 | |
|
路漫漫其修远兮 |
||
|
========== * * * * * ==========
|
 Top
|
||